2024 Easy Success ISTQB ISTQB-CTFL Exam in First Try
Best ISTQB-CTFL Exam Dumps for the Preparation of Latest Exam Questions
NEW QUESTION # 70
Which of the following is the most important task of a typical test leader?
- A. To prepare and acquire test data.
- B. To set up the test environment.
- C. To automate tests.
- D. To coordinate the test strategy with project managers.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The most important task of a typical test leader is to coordinate the test strategy with project managers. The test strategy is a high-level document that defines the general approach and objectives of testing for a project or an organization. The test leader is responsible for defining, documenting, communicating, and implementing the test strategy in alignment with the project goals and constraints. The test leader also needs to coordinate with project managers and other stakeholders to ensure that the test strategy is feasible, effective, and efficient. The other options are not the most important tasks of a typical test leader. To automate tests is a task of a test automation engineer or a test automation specialist. To prepare and acquire test data is a task of a test analyst or a test engineer. To set up the test environment is a task of a test environment manager or a test environment specialist. Verified Reference: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 13.
NEW QUESTION # 71
A software module to be used in a mission critical application incorporates an algorithm for secure transmission of data.
Which review type is most appropriate to ensure high quality and technical correctness of the algorithm?
- A. Walkthrough
- B. Management Review
- C. Informal Review
- D. Technical Review
Answer: D
Explanation:
A technical review is a type of formal review that involves a team of technical experts who evaluate a software product against a set of predefined quality criteria. A technical review is suitable for ensuring high quality and technical correctness of complex or critical software components, such as algorithms, architectures or designs.
A technical review is not a walkthrough, which is an informal review led by the author of the work product. A technical review is not an informal review, which is a review that does not follow a defined process and has no formal entry or exit criteria. A technical review is not a management review, which is a type of formal review that focuses on business aspects and project progress. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, Chapter 3, page 29-30.
NEW QUESTION # 72
Which of the following is true about Oracles?
- A. Oracles help in reproducing the irreproducible bugs
- B. Sometimes old version of a product can be used as an Oracle
- C. Oracles can be generated automatically using data generators
- D. Oracles are derived from the design
Answer: B
Explanation:
An oracle is a mechanism or source that can provide the expected result for a given test input or situation. Sometimes old version of a product can be used as an oracle, if it is assumed that the old version behaves correctly for the test cases that are executed on the new version. This is also known as back-to-back testing. Oracles do not help in reproducing the irreproducible bugs, as they only provide the expected results, not the actual results. Oracles are not derived from the design, but from the requirements or specifications. Oracles cannot be generated automatically using data generators, as data generators only provide test inputs, not test outputs. Verified Reference: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 9.
NEW QUESTION # 73
The testers in company A were part of the development team. Due to an organizational change they moved to be part of the support team.
What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this change?
- A. Advantage: increased chances to move a tester to development; Disadvantage: pulled to support tasks and having less time for testing
- B. Advantage: More independence in deciding what and how to test,Disadvantage: Isolation from me development team knowledge
- C. Advantage: being closer to customer perspective,Disadvantage less independence in perspectives
- D. Advantage: pulled to support tasks and having less time for testing, Disadvantage less chances to move a tester to development
Answer: C
Explanation:
Being part of the support team means that the testers are closer to the customer perspective, which is an advantage for testing, as they can better understand the user needs and expectations, and identify more realistic scenarios and risks. However, being part of the support team also means that they have less independence in deciding what and how to test, as they may be influenced by the customer's preferences or requests, which could compromise the objectivity and effectiveness of testing. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 6.
NEW QUESTION # 74
Which of the following statements about test reports are TRUE?
I Test reports shall be approved by the test team.
II. Test reports shall give stakeholders information as basis for decisions.
Ill Test reports shall summarize what happened through a period of testing.
IV. Test reports shall be approved by the development team, the test team and the customer
V. Test reports shall include information about remaining risks.
- A. I, III, v
- B. I, II, IV
- C. II, III, IV
- D. II, III, V
Answer: D
Explanation:
Statements II, III and V are true about test reports. Test reports are documents that provide information on the results and status of testing activities for a given period or phase. Test reports should give stakeholders information as basis for decisions, such as whether to release the software product, whether to continue testing, whether to change the scope or priorities of testing, etc. Test reports should summarize what happened through a period of testing, such as what test cases were executed, what defects were found, what risks were identified, what issues were encountered, what achievements were made, etc. Test reports should include information about remaining risks, such as what defects are still open, what test cases are still pending, what functionalities are still untested, what uncertainties are still unresolved, etc. Statements I and IV are not true about test reports. Test reports do not need to be approved by the test team, the development team, or the customer, unless it is specified by the test policy or the test plan. Test reports only need to be reviewed and verified by the test leader or the test manager before being distributed to the intended recipients. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 141.
NEW QUESTION # 75
Consider the following testing levels:
1) Component Testing
2) Integration Testing
3) System Testing
4) Acceptance Testing
Which of the following statements is true?
- A. Integration and system testing are applicable when V-model is used.
Component and acceptance testing are applicable when iterative development models are used. - B. All testing levels are applicable, independent of which software development life-cycle process (V-model. iterative, incremental) is used.
- C. Acceptance testing is applicable for all software development models.
Component and system testing are applicable only for the V-model. - D. All the testing levels are applicable to V-model for software development.
Only acceptance testing is applicable for iterative models.
Answer: B
Explanation:
All testing levels are applicable, independent of which software development life-cycle process (V-model, iterative, incremental) is used. Testing levels are defined based on the scope and objectives of testing, not on the software development model. Component testing, integration testing, system testing and acceptance testing are common testing levels that can be applied to any software development model, as long as they are planned and executed properly. The V-model is a software development model that emphasizes the relationship between each development phase and its corresponding testing phase. Iterative and incremental models are software development models that divide the development process into smaller cycles or iterations, where each iteration produces a working version of the software that can be tested and evaluated. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 18.
NEW QUESTION # 76
Which of the following tools is most likely to detect defects in functions or methods in source code?
- A. unit test framework tool
- B. configuration management tool
- C. monitoring tool
- D. test design tool
Answer: A
Explanation:
A unit test framework tool is a tool that supports the creation, execution, and reporting of unit tests, which are tests that verify the functionality and quality of individual software components (such as functions or methods) in source code. A unit test framework tool can help to detect defects in functions or methods in source code by providing features such as test case generation, test case execution, test result comparison, test coverage measurement, etc. Some examples of unit test framework tools are JUnit, NUnit, TestNG, etc. The other options are not tools that are likely to detect defects in functions or methods in source code. A configuration management tool is a tool that supports the management and control of different versions and variants of software products or components. A test design tool is a tool that supports the design and generation of test cases based on some criteria or rules. A monitoring tool is a tool that monitors the behavior or performance of a system or component under test. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 10.
NEW QUESTION # 77
Which of the following is a correct reason to apply test automation?
- A. When it is easy to automate
- B. When it is cheap to buy test automation tools
- C. When a new test automation tool is launched
- D. When there are a lot of repetitive testing tasks
Answer: D
Explanation:
A correct reason to apply test automation is when there are a lot of repetitive testing tasks. Test automation is the use of software tools or scripts to perform or support testing activities, such as test case execution, test result comparison, test data generation, etc. Test automation can be beneficial when there are a lot of repetitive testing tasks that need to be performed frequently or consistently, such as regression testing, performance testing, load testing, etc. Test automation can help to save time and effort, increase reliability and accuracy, and improve coverage and efficiency of testing. The other options are not correct reasons to apply test automation. When a new test automation tool is launched is not a reason to apply test automation, but rather a factor for choosing a test automation tool. When it is easy to automate is not a reason to apply test automation, but rather a factor for evaluating the feasibility of test automation. When it is cheap to buy test automation tools is not a reason to apply test automation, but rather a factor for estimating the cost and benefit of test automation. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 10.
NEW QUESTION # 78
Software was found lo take much more time than the stated requirement of less than one second to save a file. Upon investigation it was found that there was an unnecessary check inside a loop which was slowing down the file-save operation. The software not being able to meet the desired response time is an example of
- A. Failure
- B. Defect
- C. It is not a defect
- D. Error
Answer: A
Explanation:
A failure is an event in which a component or system does not perform a required function within specified limits. A failure is observable by the software users or other stakeholders. A failure is caused by one or more defects in the software. In this case, the software not being able to meet the desired response time is an example of a failure, as it deviates from the stated requirement and affects the user experience. It is not a defect, which is a flaw in the software that causes the failure. It is not an error, which is a human action that produces an incorrect result. It is not a non-defect, as it clearly violates a specified requirement. Verified Reference: [A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer], Chapter 1, page 4.
NEW QUESTION # 79
How can testing contribute to higher quality?
- A. Testing help to measure the quality of software.
- B. Testing ensures that remaining defects are documented.
- C. Testing removes errors in the software.
- D. Testing eliminates the risk with software.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Testing can contribute to higher quality by helping to measure the quality of software. Quality is defined as the degree to which a component or system satisfies specified requirements and customer or user needs and expectations. Testing is a process of evaluating a component or system by applying inputs and observing outputs, and comparing them with expected results. Testing can help to measure the quality of software by providing information on its functionality, performance, usability, security, reliability, etc. Testing can also help to identify and report defects in software, which can lead to improvement actions and quality assurance activities. The other options are not accurate descriptions of how testing can contribute to higher quality. Testing does not ensure that remaining defects are documented, but rather that detected defects are reported. Testing does not remove errors in software, but rather finds defects in software behavior or quality. Testing does not eliminate the risk with software, but rather assesses and manages the risk with software. Verified Reference: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 3.
NEW QUESTION # 80
As the last stage of a test cycle of an embedded device, you are performing exploratory testing. You observed that some character. (A, X andZ)sent via a serial port to the device do not get registered on the device whereas they should be. You suspect that this could be due to a wrong configuration of the "bit parity" parameter.
Which of the following items of an incident report would you beUNABLEto write down based on this information?
- A. Actual result
- B. Expected result
- C. Test setup details
- D. Test case identifier
Answer: D
Explanation:
An incident report is a document that records the details of an incident. An incident report typically contains the following items:
* Identifier: A unique identifier for the incident report
* Summary: A concise summary of the incident
* Description: A detailed description of the incident, including the steps to reproduce it, the expected and actual results, and any relevant screenshots or logs
* Severity: The degree of impact that the incident has on the system
* Priority: The level of urgency for resolving the incident
* Status: The current state of the incident, such as new, open, resolved, closed, etc.
* Resolution: The action taken to resolve the incident, such as fix, workaround, reject, etc. Based on the information given in the question, the tester would be able to write down all of these items except for the test case identifier. A test case identifier is a unique identifier for a test case that is used to link it to other test artifacts, such as test plans, test scripts, test results or incident reports. However, since the tester is performing exploratory testing, there is no predefined test case that can be associated with the incident. Exploratory testing is an approach to testing that emphasizes learning, test design and test execution at the same time. Exploratory testing relies on the tester's skills, creativity and intuition to explore the software under test and discover defects. Exploratory testing does not use formal test cases or scripts, but rather uses test charters or missions that guide the tester's actions and objectives. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, Chapter 3, page
32-33; Chapter 5, page 47-48.
NEW QUESTION # 81
A test manager defined the following test levels in her test plan; Component, System and Acceptance.
Which Software Development lifecycle is the Test Manager most likely following?
- A. Agile
- B. Prototyping
- C. Waterfall
- D. V-Model
Answer: D
Explanation:
The test manager is most likely following the V-model for software development. The V-model is a software development model that defines four testing levels that correspond to four development phases: component testing corresponds to component design, integration testing corresponds to architectural design, system testing corresponds to system requirements specification, and acceptance testing corresponds to user requirements specification. The V-model also defines the test planning and test execution activities for each testing level. Agile is a software development model that follows an iterative and incremental approach, where testing is integrated into each iteration and adapts to changing requirements and feedback. Waterfall is a software development model that follows a sequential and linear approach, where testing is performed after the development phase is completed. Prototyping is a software development model that involves creating a simplified version of the software to elicit user feedback and validate requirements before developing the final product. Verified Reference: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 18.
NEW QUESTION # 82
Why should you choose a test technique?
- A. Because this way you cover the full scope of the product's functionality
- B. Because choosing a test technique is a common practice in software testing
- C. Because you need to match the way you test to the content of the product under test
- D. Because of the time constraints that usually accompany a test project
Answer: C
Explanation:
You should choose a test technique because you need to match the way you test to the content of the product under test. A test technique is a method or process for deriving and selecting test cases based on some criteria or rules. Different test techniques are suitable for different types of software products, depending on their characteristics, functionalities, requirements, specifications, risks, etc. Choosing a test technique helps to ensure that the test cases are relevant, effective, and efficient for the product under test. The other options are not correct reasons to choose a test technique. Time constraints are not a factor for choosing a test technique, but rather for prioritizing or optimizing testing activities. Covering the full scope of the product's functionality is not a guarantee of choosing a test technique, but rather a goal of testing. Choosing a test technique is not a common practice in software testing, but rather a professional skill and responsibility. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 31.
NEW QUESTION # 83
Which of the following statements is not correct?
- A. Testing is often seen as a destructive activity instead of constructive activity
- B. Looking for defects in a system may require Ignoring system details
- C. Looking for defects in system requires professional pessimism and curiosity
- D. Identifying defects may be perceived as criticism against product
Answer: B
Explanation:
Looking for defects in a system does not require ignoring system details, but rather paying attention to them and understanding how they affect the system's quality, functionality, and usability. Ignoring system details could lead to missing important defects or testing irrelevant aspects of the system.
Identifying defects may be perceived as criticism against product, especially by the developers or stakeholders who are invested in the product's success. However, identifying defects is not meant to be a personal attack, but rather a constructive feedback that helps to improve the product and ensure its alignment with the requirements and expectations of the users and clients.
Looking for defects in system requires professional pessimism and curiosity, as testers need to anticipate and explore the possible ways that the system could fail, malfunction, or behave unexpectedly. Professional pessimism means being skeptical and critical of the system's quality and reliability, while curiosity means being eager and interested in finding out the root causes and consequences of the defects.
Testing is often seen as a destructive activity instead of constructive activity, as it involves finding and reporting the flaws and weaknesses of the system, rather than creating or enhancing it. However, testing is actually a constructive activity, as it contributes to the system's improvement, verification, validation, and optimization, and ultimately to the delivery of a high-quality product that meets the needs and expectations of the users and clients.
NEW QUESTION # 84
A test manager defined the following test levels in her test plan; Component, System and Acceptance.
Which Software Development lifecycle is the Test Manager most likely following?
- A. Agile
- B. Prototyping
- C. Waterfall
- D. V-Model
Answer: D
Explanation:
The test manager is most likely following the V-model for software development. The V-model is a software development model that defines four testing levels that correspond to four development phases: component testing corresponds to component design, integration testing corresponds to architectural design, system testing corresponds to system requirements specification, and acceptance testing corresponds to user requirements specification. The V-model also defines the test planning and test execution activities for each testing level. Agile is a software development model that follows an iterative and incremental approach, where testing is integrated into each iteration and adapts to changing requirements and feedback. Waterfall is a software development model that follows a sequential and linear approach, where testing is performed after the development phase is completed. Prototyping is a softwaredevelopment model that involves creating a simplified version of the software to elicit user feedback and validate requirements before developing the final product. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page
18.
NEW QUESTION # 85
What type of testing measures its effectiveness by tracking which lines of code were executed by the tests?
- A. Structural testing
- B. Exploratory testing
- C. Acceptance testing
- D. Integration testing
Answer: A
Explanation:
Structural testing is a type of testing that measures its effectiveness by tracking which lines of code were executed by the tests. Structural testing, also known as white-box testing or glass-box testing, is based on the internal structure, design, or implementation of the software. Structural testing aims to verify that the software meets the specified quality attributes, such as performance, security, reliability, or maintainability, by exercising the code paths, branches, statements, conditions, or data flows. Structural testing uses various coverage metrics, such as function coverage, line coverage, branch coverage, or statement coverage, to determine how much of the code has been tested and to identify any untested or unreachable parts of the code. Structural testing can be applied at any level of testing, such as unit testing, integration testing, system testing, or acceptance testing, but it is more commonly used at lower levels, where the testers have access to the source code.
The other options are not correct because they are not types of testing that measure their effectiveness by tracking which lines of code were executed by the tests. Acceptance testing is a type of testing that verifies that the software meets the acceptance criteria and the user requirements. Acceptance testing is usually performed by the end-users or customers, who may not have access to the source code or the technical details of the software. Acceptance testing is more concerned with the functionality, usability, or suitability of the software, rather than its internal structure or implementation. Integration testing is a type of testing that verifies that the software components or subsystems work together as expected. Integration testing is usually performed by the developers or testers, who may use both structural and functional testing techniques to check the interfaces, interactions, or dependencies between the components or subsystems. Integration testing is more concerned with the integration logic, data flow, or communication of the software, rather than its individual lines of code. Exploratory testing is a type of testing that involves simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution. Exploratory testing is usually performed by the testers, who use their creativity, intuition, or experience to explore the software and discover any defects, risks, or opportunities for improvement. Exploratory testing is more concerned with the behavior, quality, or value of the software, rather than its internal structure or implementation. Reference = ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level (CTFL) v4.0 syllabus, Chapter 4: Test Techniques, Section 4.3: Structural Testing Techniques, Pages 51-54; Chapter 1: Fundamentals of Testing, Section 1.4: Testing Throughout the Software Development Lifecycle, Pages 11-13; Chapter 3: Static Testing, Section 3.4: Exploratory Testing, Pages 40-41.
NEW QUESTION # 86
Which of the following would be the LEAST likely to be used as the basis for a test exit criteria?
- A. Test schedules
- B. Number of unfixed defects
- C. Confidence of testers in tested code
- D. Cost of testing performed so far
Answer: A
Explanation:
Test exit criteria are the conditions or requirements that must be met before testing can be concluded. Test exit criteria are usually defined in the test plan and agreed by the stakeholders. Test exit criteria can be based on various factors, such as test coverage, defect status, quality level, risk level, etc. Test schedules would be the least likely to be used as the basis for test exit criteria, because test schedules are not directly related to the quality or performance of the software product, but rather to the time or resources allocated for testing. Test schedules can be used as the basis for test entry criteria, which are the conditions or requirements that must be met before testing can start. The other options are more likely to be used as the basis for test exit criteria. Cost of testing performed so far can be used as a basis for test exit criteria, because it can indicate the return on investment or the cost-benefit ratio of testing. Confidence of testers in tested code can be used as a basis for test exit criteria, because it can reflect the level of satisfaction or assurance of the testers about the quality or reliability of the software product. Number of unfixed defects can be used as a basis for test exit criteria, because it can indicate the level of risk or impact of the remaining defects on the software product. Verified References: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, page 13.
NEW QUESTION # 87
Which of the following statements about reviews are TRUE?
I In walkthroughs the review meeting is typically led by the author.
II Inspection is characterized by an open-ended review meeting
III Preparation before the review meeting is part of informal reviews
IV Management rarely participates in technical review meetings
- A. I, II
- B. III, IV
- C. II, Ill
- D. I, IV
Answer: D
Explanation:
The following statements about reviews are true:
I) In walkthroughs the review meeting is typically led by the author. A walkthrough is a type of review that has a predefined objective and agenda but no formal process or roles. A walkthrough is typically led by the author of the work product under review, who guides the participants through a scenario and solicits feedback.
IV) Management rarely participates in technical review meetings. A technical review is a type of review that has a predefined objective and agenda but no formal process or roles. A technical review is typically performed by peers with technical expertise in order to evaluate technical aspects of a work product. Management rarely participates in technical review meetings, as they may not have sufficient technical knowledge or skills to contribute effectively. The following statements about reviews are false:
II) Inspection is characterized by an open-ended review meeting. An inspection is a type of review that follows a defined process with formal entry and exit criteria and roles and responsibilities for participants. An inspection is characterized by a structured review meeting with a fixed duration and agenda.
III) Preparation before the review meeting is part of informal reviews. Preparation before the review meeting is part of formal reviews, such as inspections or technical reviews. Preparation involves checking
NEW QUESTION # 88
Which of the following is NOT a deciding factor m determining the extent of testing required?
- A. Time available to do testing
- B. A particular tester involved in testing
- C. Level of risk of the product or features
- D. Budget to do testing
Answer: B
Explanation:
The extent of testing required for a software product depends on various factors, such as the level of risk, the budget, and the time available. The level of risk reflects the potential impact of failures on the stakeholders and the environment. The budget determines how much resources can be allocated for testing. The time available defines the schedule and deadlines for testing activities. The particular tester involved in testing is not a deciding factor for the extent of testing required, as testing should be based on objective criteria and not on personal preferences or abilities. Verified Reference: [A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer], Chapter 2, page 14-15.
NEW QUESTION # 89
The following 4 equivalence classes are given:
Which of the following alternatives includes correct test values for x. based on equivalence partitioning?
- A. -500; 0; 100; 1000
- B. -1000; -100; 100; 1000
- C. -99; 99:101; 1001
- D. -100; 100:1000; 1001
Answer: B
Explanation:
* The question is about selecting the correct test values for x based on equivalence partitioning.
Equivalence partitioning is a software test design technique that divides the input data of a software unit into partitions of equivalent data from which test cases can be derived. In this case, the given equivalence classes are:
* (x \leq -100)
* (-100 < x < 100)
* (100 \leq x < 1000)
* (x \geq 1000)
Option D provides a value from each of these partitions:
* For (x \leq -100), it gives -1000.
* For (-100 < x < 100), it gives -100 and 100.
* For (100 \leq x < 1000), it gives 500.
* For (x \geq 1000), it gives 1500.
So, option D covers all four given equivalence classes with appropriate values.
References: ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level (CTFL) v4.0 documents available at ISTQB and ASTQB.
* 1: ISTQB Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 38
* 2: ISTQB Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 39
* : ISTQB Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 40
NEW QUESTION # 90
Which of the following statements is an example of testing contributing to higher quality?
- A. A tester installs a test ten in the lest environment
- B. A project manager asks to a test leader to estimate the test effort
- C. A tester finds a bug which is resolved prior to release
- D. A test leader writes a test summary report
Answer: C
Explanation:
* The question is about identifying an example of testing contributing to higher quality. Quality is the degree to which a component, system or process meets specified requirements and/or user/customer needs and expectations1. Testing is the process consisting of all lifecycle activities, both static and dynamic, concerned with planning, preparation and evaluation of software products and related work products to determine that they satisfy specified requirements, to demonstrate that they are fit for purpose and to detect defects2.
* Therefore, testing contributes to higher quality by verifying and validating that the software products and related work products meet the specified requirements, are fit for purpose and have no defects, or at least have a reduced number of defects. Testing also provides information about the quality of the software products and related work products to the stakeholders, who can make informed decisions based on the test results3.
* Out of the four given statements, only option D is an example of testing contributing to higher quality, as it shows that testing has detected a defect (a flaw in a component or system that can cause the component or system to fail to perform its required function4) and that the defect has been resolved (fixed and confirmed) prior to release (delivery of the software product to the customer or end user).
This means that testing has prevented a potential failure (an event in which a component or system does not perform a required function within specified limits) from occurring in the operational environment, and thus has improved the quality of the software product.
* Option A is not an example of testing contributing to higher quality, as it is a reporting activity that summarizes the test results and evaluates the test objectives, but does not directly affect the quality of the software product or related work products. A test summary report is a document that records and communicates the outcomes of testing activities, including test completion criteria, test results, incident reports, test summary and evaluation, and lessons learned.
* Option B is not an example of testing contributing to higher quality, as it is a planning activity that estimates the resources and time needed for testing activities, but does not directly affect the quality of the software product or related work products. A test effort estimate is an approximation of the amount of work and/or the duration of time required to perform testing activities.
* Option C is not an example of testing contributing to higher quality, as it is a preparation activity that sets up the test environment (an environment containing hardware, instrumentation, simulators, software tools, and other support elements needed to conduct a test), but does not directly affect the quality of the software product or related work products. A test environment installation is a process of installing and configuring the test environment according to the test environment specification.
References:
* 1: ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 10
* 2: ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 11
* 3: ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 12
* 4: ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 13
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 13
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 77
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 78
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 79
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 80
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 81
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 82
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 83
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 84
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 85
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 86
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 87
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 88
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 89
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 90
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 91
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 92
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 93
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 94
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 95
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 96
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 97
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 98
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 99
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 100
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 101
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 102
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 103
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 104
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 105
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 106
* : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2018, Version 4.0, p. 107
NEW QUESTION # 91
Which of the following is the main benefit of a configuration management of testware?
- A. All testware is backed up with restore option, including incident reports and change requests. B. The testware can be traced to information in requirements tools and to the bug tracking system.
- B. All testware items are identified, version controlled, tracked tor changes with relation to each other
- C. There is an easy way to assess the level to test coverage provided by the existing tests
Answer: B
Explanation:
Configuration management of testware is a critical aspect of maintaining the integrity and traceability of test assets throughout the testing lifecycle. The main benefit of configuration management is to ensure that all testware items, such as test cases, test scripts, test data, and test results, are systematically identified, version controlled, and tracked for changes in relation to each other.
Option C accurately describes this benefit. By applying configuration management principles to testware, teams can manage changes to test assets efficiently, ensuring that the testware remains consistent, up-to-date, and aligned with the version of the software under test. This control mechanism facilitates the reproducibility of tests, enhances the reliability of testing activities, and supports traceability from requirements through to defects.
Options A, B, and D describe other aspects of test management and testing processes but do not capture the core benefit of configuration management of testware, which is centered on the systematic control and tracking of testware items.
NEW QUESTION # 92
As the last stage of a test cycle of an embedded device, you are performing exploratory testing. You observed that some character. (A, X and Z) sent via a serial port to the device do not get registered on the device whereas they should be. You suspect that this could be due to a wrong configuration of the "bit parity" parameter.
Which of the following items of an incident report would you be UNABLE to write down based on this information?
- A. Actual result
- B. Expected result
- C. Test setup details
- D. Test case identifier
Answer: D
Explanation:
An incident report is a document that records the details of an incident. An incident report typically contains the following items:
Identifier: A unique identifier for the incident report
Summary: A concise summary of the incident
Description: A detailed description of the incident, including the steps to reproduce it, the expected and actual results, and any relevant screenshots or logs Severity: The degree of impact that the incident has on the system Priority: The level of urgency for resolving the incident Status: The current state of the incident, such as new, open, resolved, closed, etc.
Resolution: The action taken to resolve the incident, such as fix, workaround, reject, etc. Based on the information given in the question, the tester would be able to write down all of these items except for the test case identifier. A test case identifier is a unique identifier for a test case that is used to link it to other test artifacts, such as test plans, test scripts, test results or incident reports. However, since the tester is performing exploratory testing, there is no predefined test case that can be associated with the incident. Exploratory testing is an approach to testing that emphasizes learning, test design and test execution at the same time. Exploratory testing relies on the tester's skills, creativity and intuition to explore the software under test and discover defects. Exploratory testing does not use formal test cases or scripts, but rather uses test charters or missions that guide the tester's actions and objectives. Verified Reference: A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus - Springer, Chapter 3, page 32-33; Chapter 5, page 47-48.
NEW QUESTION # 93
......
ISTQB-CTFL Study Material, Preparation Guide and PDF Download: https://www.examtorrent.com/ISTQB-CTFL-valid-vce-dumps.html
ISTQB-CTFL Actual Questions 100% Same Braindumps with Actual Exam: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Q16wF0uFB1zNNuox4jCj66fn7UIfyUiD
